Friday, December 30, 2016

“The Garden Of Words” & Koi

Two quick notes: first, please try to watch “The Garden of Words” before reading this (it’s only 46 minutes long and is available for free online), and second, while you’re watching, please keep the idea of romance out of your head and don't skip the credits!


            Let’s ask ourselves a very philosophical, and deeply human, question: what is the nature of love, or posed another way, what characterizes love? An innumerable number of authors and artists have created an innumerable amount of works dedicated to answering this very puzzling, but important, question.

In recent years, a number of works, notably films, have explored new ideas in relation to just what exactly is the nature of love. From the idea of love between a human and non-human put forth by the brilliant drama film “Her,” to the idea of love defying traditional gender ideals as depicted in the very engaging and whimsical anime film “Your Name,” the traditional idea of love in the United States and abroad has been challenged by cinema a number of times. These challenges are most likely a result of changing social norms and the advent of a brand-new and constantly evolving online world that has created a wholly new way to foster and have relationships with other people and fall in love.


With this new online world and quickly evolving social norms, there is one film that put forth a very foreign, at least to my mind, and interesting idea related to the nature of love: the 2013 anime film directed by Makoto Shinkai titled “The Garden of Words.” In this masterfully crafted visual and thematic odyssey, Shinkai weaves the traditional Japanese meaning behind the word “love” into a very appropriate and poignant setting in modern Japanese society; and in the process, he teaches us volumes about the nature of love itself and how we should go about our relationships with others.


            In order to fully understand this film, one needs to know and understand what the director was intending to convey, and by that I mean one must know the fundamental difference between two meanings associated with the word concept: love. The commonly used and modern concept for “love” in the Japanese language is ren’ai. This word reflects a Western-influenced idea of romance per the likes of some of Shakespeare’s stories and Victorian ideals. In contrast, the older, more traditional concept for “love” is koi. This concept of “love” came about in the era of Man'yōshū, and the kanji used in koi reflect the idea of “love” that was prevalent at that time (“The Garden of Words”). When translated, the word’s kanji is read quite literally as “lonely sadness,” and this meaning is interpreted by Shinkai to mean simply “longing for someone in solitude” (“The Garden of Words”). 

            With that, Shinkai intended to make the central elements of “The Garden Of Words” loneliness and love by expressing the meaning of koi and its traditional idea of “lonely sadness” in a modern, very real and relatable, societal setting. It is not a cookie-cutter romance story that is perpetuated in American cinemas, and it is not the melodramatic mess that many think it is. Instead, “The Garden of Words” is a wonderfully detailed masterpiece delving into an old, but paradoxically kind of new, idea of the nature of love that is wholly lacking in romance and full of companioned-sized holes in all our hearts.


            The story starts with the main male character, the 15 year-old Takao Akizuki, skipping school to enjoy his hobby of shoe designing under the gaze of a rainy morning in the Shinjuku Gyoen National Garden. During his foray into the garden, he encounters another person, the main female character, seemingly doing the same thing: skipping out on societal responsibilities to enjoy their hobbies or quirks. He immediately notices that she is enjoying the rainy morning by delving into beer and eating chocolate, and he points them out as perhaps being her quirks. In contrast, she notices that he is a student and is skipping out on his responsibilities as well. After this realization, she leaves him with a one piece of a tanka, a form of Japanese poetry, from the era of Man'yōshū:


            With the mysterious woman and tanka embedded in his head, Takao visits the garden on another rainy morning and finds the same woman doing the same things. They acknowledge each other’s company and, after some light conversation, they both resolve to meet each other on rainy morning in the garden. Over the course of Tokyo’s rainy season, they meet and, quite simply, talk to one another. Takao talks about his dream of becoming a shoemaker, an odd career path in today’s tech-driven world, and she simply listens to him. He talks about his life, his aspirations, and his future to her, but she does not even disclose her name, nor her life, dreams, loves, or pain. One day, she states that “before I knew it, I wasn’t able to walk properly anymore” (“The Garden of Words”). In response, Takao decides to make a pair of shoes for her in order to help her walk again.

            Eventually, the rainy season ends and their meetings become non-existent. We see both of them lamenting the passing of the rainy season, particularly the woman, who we learn has both been bullied and largely detached from “normal” society. When Takao’s school year starts, he, and the audience, finally learns who the woman is. We learn that she is Yukari Yukino, the 27 year-old classical literature teacher at Takao’s high school, and that she was subject to petty bullying by her students over a jealous tiff. Takao confronts the bullies, gets beat up, and meets Yukino again at the garden. Now that the apparent veil concealing Yukino’s identity has been lifted, Takao is able to figure out and recite to her the other piece of the tanka that she left him pondering the first time they met:


            Soon after, they get caught in a rainstorm and proceed to spend the afternoon at her apartment eating and talking to their hearts’ delight. They both describe their shared afternoon as the happiest time of their lives. Takao later confesses that he thinks he has fallen in love with Yukino. She dismisses this, stating that she is moving back to her hometown soon, and she thanks him for helping her walk again. After exchanging a solemn and role-respecting “arigatou gozaimashita,” he abruptly leaves (An Analysis…). She looks back at their shared time in the garden and decides to chase after Takao. They confront each other in a rain soaked stairwell overlooking the garden, and Takao lets out a burst of anger at Yukino about her never opening up to him and never sharing anything about herself because he thinks she is just humoring a young man with high aspirations. As the rain stops and the sun start to shine, Yukino embraces Takao and opens up to him by telling him how he saved her.

            We then see them part ways on different paths, with one starting a new path while the other staying steady on another. At the end, we see Takao reading a letter from Yukino in the garden with the shoes he made for Yukino at his side. After finishing the letter, he leaves the shoes in the garden and vows to see her again once he learns to walk on his own as well.


Throughout the film, we see that Yukino has an issue; after all, she is sitting in a park illegally drinking beer and eating various chocolates in her work clothes on rainy days. However, that issue is slowly elaborated upon, and with its reveal comes one of the important take ways from the film thematically. Yukino was happily pursuing her dreams, having relationships, and generally engaged in society until she was subject to bullying by her students. This horrendous treatment, over a jealous tiff remember, caused her to go into a very depressed and psychologically negative state wherein it got so bad that she developed a bad taste disorder, hence the beer and chocolate.  During these hard times for her, it is revealed that everyone around her, even her boyfriend, Mr. Itou, who is a dean at her high school, didn’t believe her and treated her situation as solely her own problem. Instead of going to the police with harassment charges, Mr. Itou decided to put the school’s, and by extension his own, reputation ahead of Yukino’s dire situation. As a result, the façade that Yukino held about society and her relationships were all but destroyed wherein she realized that all her relationships that she held dear and cherished were empty and superficial (Kotonoha no Niwa). She realizes that she was being ignored by the people she held dear as well as by society itself. It may be said that she was not even treated as a human during that time (Review: “The…). She realizes that she was experiencing what it truly means to be alone or to be in a state of “lonely sadness;” to be utterly, unflinchingly ignored by those around you despite their presence (Kotonoha no Niwa). She utterly lost the will to create or maintain relationships with other people after this soul-crushing realization, and that is when we first see her in the garden drinking beer and eating chocolate, alone, as the rain falls down around her.


In contrast, Takao seems to be going through the same thing, albeit in a drastically different situation and manner. In watching his interactions with others besides Yukino, one is almost forced to see that he is lacking in meaningful connections with other people as well. His mother is seen to run out on her children, his brother is seen to see him and his dreams as just teenage obsessions, and his friends seem to be held at arm’s length. All of these interactions point to the idea that Takao is in a state of lonely sadness as well, but like the “old” Yukino, he simply hasn’t yet realized that his relationships are in that same state (Kotonoha no Niwa).


This creates an interesting dynamic, and one that drives the film’s plot and climax. From their first meeting, it is shown that Takao and Yukino don’t know each other as people normally would. In a sense, most “normal” relationships can be seen as a public interaction turning into a private relationship wherein one exchanges the customary greetings and small talk before getting to know another or divulge one’s personality and characteristics. Inversely, Yukino and Takao get to know each other by sharing their private selves first, and only learning of each other’s public attributes by sheer happenstance. For example, their first impressions of one another are about the things they do not want society to find out, such as skipping school to draw or skipping work to drink and eat alone (An Analysis…). It is this private “life” divulgence, or “opening up,” that draws Yukino into her relationship with Takao, and this is especially seen in the content and nature of the tanka she leaves Takao with after their first meeting. She wants someone to open up to her and simply treat her as another person, and her use of the tanka subtly and eloquently verbalizes her longing. By opening himself up to her, not outwardly caring about her name, title, occupation, or past, she finally feels connected to another person again.

Takao hints at a similar feeling of longing for a meaningful human connection throughout the film, and mistakes it for romantic love near the end during their afternoon together, but he doesn’t truly realize its nature until the end when she opens up to him (Kotonoha no Niwa). By stating that their interactions was the only thing that saved her from a life of lonely sadness, he finally realizes that he was trying to fill the same “hole” she was, and that he was also trying to climb out of the pit of lonely sadness that plagued his relationships. Ultimately, no “love” is declared as there is simply the realization and acceptance that they both saved each other from lonely sadness and filled the hole that they so desperately wanted filled.

At its core, koi is about people’s craving for companionship in the most basic sense: a simple connection between two people that is unclouded by expectations of romance or sex. There seems to be a companion-sized hole in all our “hearts,” by that I mean our emotional, psychological, and interpersonal well-being, that we constantly, almost incessantly, attempt to fill. To be an existentialist for a moment, we desperately crave for some form of acknowledgement or recognition of our existence; we need confirmation that we are indeed alive, and the apparent “fix” for that is companionship. That “hole” cannot be filled, nor is it ever filled, by the indifference and apathy that is experienced when one is in a state of “lonely sadness” because to be regarded with indifference and apathy is the same thing as being ignored which is the exact opposite of that recognition we crave (Kotonoha no Niwa). But, koi, or simply the act of “longing for someone in solitude,” can be seen as the sole way to “fill” that companion-sized hole as it drives that fundamental need for companionship and recognition.

Essentially, Shinkai wants the audience to consider the idea that love is born out of fundamental need for companionship and recognition, and not out of a need to high-strung romance or sexual desire. Even more, perhaps Shinkai wants the audience to consider the idea that love is simply two connected people regardless of anything else, whether that is age, sex, or occupation (Kotonoha no Niwa). As it is presented in the film, and perhaps for Shinkai himself, love is both the longing for someone in solitude and the subsequent cessation of that longing in the creation of a meaningful connection with another person.


In the end, however, Shinkai does an interesting thing with Takao and Yukino’s relationship, and I think speaks even more volumes about the nature of love. By helping each other either learn or relearn how to “walk,” Shinkai reveals that, while they “saved” each other by each making the other realize their lack of actually meaningful and not superficial human relationships, they fundamentally need to part ways and continue to “walk” their own paths. With that, the theme of koi and “lonely sadness” is elevated to a lesson on both why "loneliness shouldn’t be treated as something that must be fixed" and one's “purpose” in life because love should enable people, not disable them (“The Garden of Words”).

After seeing Yukino and Takao’s embrace during the film’s climax, I found the ending extremely confusing as it was the exact opposite of what I expected to happen. Why do they, after “saving” each other, simply part ways and perhaps never see each other again? Shinkai answers elegantly answers this question in the film’s ending, where “The Garden of Words” can come to be seen as a film about two people losing, or desperately trying to find, their purpose in life and, consequently, their “will” to live or progress in life. Yukino lost her drive and purpose because of her experiences with her bullying students and her realization that she was not even treated as a human being, even by those she holds most dear. Takao is desperately trying to find a purpose for his life as seen in his passion for shoemaking and dispassion for normal school. Their “paths” in life have either been lost or not concrete and clear as a result of their shared experience of lonely sadness. Put simply, they can’t walk their individual paths. In “saving” each other, they can see their paths sprawled out before them where Yukino continues to teach in her hometown and Takao continues his training to become a shoemaker. They both learned how to walk, either again or for the first time, their individual paths through their mutual companionship with one another, through koi and “longing for someone in solitude.” If they had simply stayed together, then neither of them would have ever gotten back up and walking on their paths as they would have been stuck in their “garden” simply fulfilling each other’s need for a connection to others (Kotonoha no Niwa).


Through the film’s wonderful ending, Shinkai makes one final statement about the nature of love, wherein perhaps “love,” in its most basic form: companionship arising from an understanding of lonely sadness, koi, is meant to help people walk their individual path in life. Essentially, love shouldn’t be seen as the mere means or “drug” that many people think it is; instead, love should be seen as the one of the many “sets of directions” to life that seeks to help people along the path of life. In the end, Yukino and Takao realize that they helped each other do just that: help each other along the path of life. Their time in and around their “garden of words” helped them, quite simply, find their own motivations to walk the path of life and live.

~ Author’s Note: You can watch and read my thematic analysis of “The Wind Rises” and see a very similar conclusion and statement made by Miyazaki about dreams. Pretty cool! ~


I know that this is a very hard, dense, and really unflinching film that doesn’t really cater to normal audiences to well that are looking for an animated version of a romantic drama. This was a hard film for me to understand and process, a lover of film and its themes, but that is a testament to both what Shinkai was able to create and just how hard to “show” the included themes is. The fact of the matter is that I cannot find another Western film that portrays this theme, even in different form, as all the base ideas and or execution seem to be drastically different. There simply isn’t anything else like this film except for a few Miyazaki films in my experience.

I want to be clear that this is by no means the only interpretation for this film as there are numerous other symbols, ideas, and overall thematic interpretations that I haven’t even touched in this analysis. I encourage you to watch this film for yourself, read other analyses, and form your own interpretations on the film because I think this film’s themes are very important in this day and age.

I think that this film, even before the beginning of the writing process for this post, is what truly got me motivated to pursue filmmaking simply because, on a seemingly subconscious level, I could tell that every frame, sound, movement, rain drop had a distinct and noteworthy purpose in the story and themes. The visuals are the story and I strongly admire Shinkai for the work he did on this film. It truly is a master-class in film form, but, more specifically, it is a master-class telling a story almost totally visually, all the while surrounding a very difficult theme, with minimal dialogue and a short duration.

Every time I watch “The Garden of Words,” I get very, almost stupidly, happy on the inside, despite some of the more sad portions of the story and themes, simply because I feel as though this film has helped me begin to walk my path, just like Takao, Yukino, and even Shinkai have.

~ Works Cited ~






No comments:

Post a Comment